Okay, since I’ve been involved in theatre for nearly my entire life and am one of the hosts of The Art and Business of Community Theater (which, as of this writing at least, is still the only podcast dedicated to advancing community/amateur theater) I figure it’s about time to list a few favorite roles I’ve had the privilege to perform over the years:
Pseudolus from A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum: based on the number of times I’ve done this role (three) it’s clearly my favorite and one I would do again in a heartbeat if offered the chance. As the protagonist of this classical musical farce Pseudolus has the most action, words, and songs, but I would argue he also has the most fun. The character has been played on Broadway by the late great Zero Mostel, Phil Silvers (who originally turned down the part), Nathan Lane, and, for one Tony Award winning scene, Jason Alexander among other notable actors. Interestingly enough, the character is based on an actual ancient Roman character created by Plautus.
Oliver Warbucks from Annie: I played “Daddy Warbucks” twice! IYKYK.
Big Daddy from A Cat on a Hot Tin Roof: the other daddy wasn’t nearly as nice as Warbucks ended up being. Who doesn’t love to play on of Tennessee William’s best known characters – though I’m sure I didn’t hold a candle to Burl Ives’ perfect portrayal in the movie.
Lenny from Of Mice and Men: though I didn’t, and don’t, have the imposing stature of Lenny as described in the novella, the director managed to find a cast that was, with one notable exception, smaller and shorter than me so it all worked out in the end. The biggest complement I got was afterwards when a friend who had a sister who was special needs told me that I played Lenny with dignity and without making a caricature of him as so often happens.
Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer from an unnamed elementary school play: the first role I was cast in back in fourth grade. No lines but I think I managed to get the deep pathos of the character across.
Bertha Bumiller and the gang from the Tuna series: I’ve had the pleasure of being in all four of the Greater Tuna plays (Greater Tuna, A Tuna Christmas, Red, White and Tuna, and Tuna Does Vegas) so though Bertha is my favorite in these series of two-performer plays (usually two men) I’ve played several of the characters up to four times.
Albert from Escanaba in ‘Da Moonlight: He’s da epitome of a perfect Yupper. I said “Yupper” not “Yuppie,” two different tings. Look it up.
Poppa Goat from The Billy Goats Gruff: the first role I remember playing in a masterwork that I wrote, produced, and directed in my parents’ back yard with my siblings and kids from the neighborhood to the everlasting delight of our collective parents. All who paid a dime to watch us perform!
These are the roles that first came to mind when I decided to share a list of my favorites. But there have been may others. That’s the beauty of community theatre. Stick with it and you’ll play more roles than Hollywood’s biggest stars could ever dream of! Who needs fame and fortune when you can play Jonathon Brewster, Teddy Brewster, and Dr. Einstein in three different productions of “Arsenic and Old Lace?”
I’d love to see what your favorite roles have been! Maybe we even have a few in common.
Me as “Big Daddy” dressing down “Big Momma” (Mary Kurtz) in Cat on a Hot Tin RoofMe rocking the pant suit in the 1989 production of “Greater Tuna” along with one of my favorite actors, Brian Burchette-RossEven the critics like us! Bob Yoman and I posing as all the characters in “A Tuna Christmas.” Ain’t Photoshop fun? Me as Lenny and Ion as Curly in “Of MIce and Men” back in 2010Me explaining the glories of NYC to Annie in the show of the same name. This was the second time I played Warbucks. This time I shaved my head – it’s not like there was much hair there anyway.
Not that anyone asked, but in addition to the podcast that I am on – The Art and Business of Community Theater and Popped Culture – I find myself listening to an every changing list of podcasts. Over the past couple of years though several have risen to my frequently listened to list. Here they are in no particular order:
Bigfoot and Beyond with Cliff and Bobo – the title is pretty self-explanatory but this is podcast on bigfooting hosted by Cliff Barackman and James “Bobo” Fay or Finding Bigfoot fame (okay, this is my never miss an episode podcast).
Brains and Gains with Dr. David Maconi – in this case the doctor is a dentist, but he promotes a non-nonsense, fact based approach to natural bodybuilding. Every week he invites health experts and thought leaders to share their expertise.
Dinners on Me with Jesse Tyler Ferguson – discussions with celebrities over dinner. Including many he’s known professionally and socially.
Mike Birbiglia’s Working It Out – despite the title there’s no work outs in the usual sense. Comedian Mike Birbiglia talks with other funny people about their lives, process, and then they work out some bits that they may be developing.
Dear Bob and Sue: A National Parks Podcast – insights into visiting national parks and other public lands of the USA from a couple, Matt and Karen Smith, who have visited every national park!
History That Doesn’t Suck – a bi-weekly podcast about American history. Well researched by Professor Greg Jackson from Utah Valley University and his staff and it includes a bibliography for every episode. Entertaining and eye-opening look at events we all think we know about.
What podcast are you listening to? I’d love to know what I might be missing out on please leave a comment below with your current favorites.
SPOILER ALERT – the following review/rant includes minor spoilers for the new Rob Zombie film The Munsters now available on DVD and Netflix.
Okay, I haven’t really posted too many reviews of movies or television shows on this blog but one has come along that I feel I must comment on. Rob Zombie’s version of The Munsters.
High Hopes
I was really looking forward to this reboot. I so badly wanted it to succeed. I didn’t even give up hope after the trailer was released.
I am not familiar with Zombie’s other films or even his music but I understood he was a fan of the original series and that usually bodes well for a film as I suspected that the source material would be treated with some reverence and respect while adding a modern sensibility to a childhood (and adulthood frankly) favorite series.
I was wrong.
Hopes Dashed
After watching Zombie’s version of The Munsters I questioned if he had actually watched the original series. While there were some obvious nods to the first series, most notably Lily’s brother Lester and a cameo by Zombo, a lot of this movie just did not ring true. I will admit that he got the house right and the look of the characters was nearly spot on. Though I was surprised that The Count, aka Grandpa, had a mustache I finally realized that this may have been because in Bram Stocker’s novel Dracula had a mustache (or so I heard, I haven’t gone back to check).
I was not thrown off by Zombie’s directing style or the look of the movie. The acting was solid and fit the nature of the style that Zombie was using. Though truth be told, I wasn’t terribly impressed with Jeff Daniel Phillips (Herman) or Sherry Moon Zombie (Lily). Both seemed to be trying to do an impersonation of the original cast (Fred Gwynne and Yvonne DeCarl0) and missing the mark. They would have been better off actually just making the characters their own.
I had a minor issue with make up and Lily’s hair – the stripe is supposed to be down the middle of the scalp not on the side and I thought Herman’s green was a little over the top. Otherwise the costuming was spot on.
I also wish that the script had a better plot. After Herman and Lily finally got together the movie just kind of kept going aimlessly and moved the family to America in a forced and illogical way.
The Problem with Reboots
Lost forever?
But my biggest issue with the movie was that Zombie, who is also credited as the writer, chose to re-write Herman’s origin and to a lesser degree Grandpa’s as well.
In the original series it was very clear, at least to me, that Herman (and his twin brother Charlie) was one of Frankenstein’s monsters. Not THE Frankenstein monster, but the culmination of Victor Frankenstein’s experiments. The success as it were. Maybe it has something to do with rights as a previous reboot (Mockingbird Lane) also changed Herman’s origin so that Grandpa had built him as a mate for Lily. Zombie chose to introduce a random mad scientist along with a sidekick instead and have Herman built in the present day instead of back in the early 1800s.
Similarly, Grandpa’s origin was tweaked and I had the impression that he was supposed to be the original Count Dracula (aka Vlad the Impaler) instead of A Dracula as was hinted in the original series where Grandpa was known as Sam Dracula.
The difference in the origins to me is significant to the characters. In Herman’s case instead of being Frankenstein’s success he becomes Dr. Wolfgang’s (Richard Brake) failure in a gag taken directly from Mel Brooks’ Young Frankenstein. In The Counts case it means that the kindly Grandpa we grew up with was now a predatory, ruthless creature of the night.
Which brings me to what I think is too often a problem with reboots of so many movies and television shows. The desire to make something new out of something old often leads to changes in the character that are so drastic that they change the dynamic which made the characters successful in the first place.
Creative License or Re-Writing History?
Now, to be fair, I get it. As a playwright I’ve taken some old properties and told new stories with them. Most notably Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Dickens’ A Christmas Carol. However, I believe I was able to tell new stories without changing basic things that made the core characters who they were. In the comics “what if…” kinds of stories are told all the time but usually with more success. Regardless of the “universe” the stories are set in Superman is rocketed from the doomed planet Krypton, Bruce Wayne’s parents are killed in front of him, Wonder Woman is an Amazon, Peter Parker is bitten by a spider, the Fantastic Four…well, let’s not talk about the Fantastic Four.
And I think there was a very interesting and amusing story that could have been told about how Herman and Lily met by following the original series’ “canon.” Based on the original series and the movie that followed (the underrated Munster Go Home) after Herman was assembled he left Germany to go to the United Kingdom where he was “adopted” by a family named Munster – not just given the name by a lab assistant in an offhand comment- and then he moved to Transylvania where he eventually met Lily and they then emigrated to the United States. Plenty of room for, dare I say it, an epic quest and love story.
Instead we got a jumbled mess, set in an unknown time period (now? the 1960s? who knows…), with characters who don’t act like they should based on the origins they’ve been given.
Oh well, there is a reason that this film went directly to video and Netflix. If there is ever another reboot maybe we’ll get the story of why Herman wandered from country to country so much before finding his way to 1313 Mockingbird Lane. I guess I can take some solace in the fact that The Addams Family doesn’t seem to be faring much better these days.
Fortunately, Disney gave us the sequel to Hocus Pocus so the season isn’t entirely lost.
I’d love to know what you thought of The Munsters and think of reboots in general.
Technically I have been blogging since 2008 which is when I opened up my first WordPress.com account and posted a blog titled Crohn’s Attack. I then didn’t post anything until February of 2010 with a post on body size, training, and other stuff which was titled simply enough Body Size, Training and Other Stuff. In fact, the first six years of this blog were the least prolific and, not surprisingly, the least read years of it’s existence. I didn’t start posting regularly until 2014 when I reached 720 views with 427 visitors. Things kept progressing slowly after that point. I wrote more often and got more viewers ready 2,177 in 2019.
Then in 2020 something both interesting and amazing happened. I posted only once that entire year – you read that correctly – one post in all of 2020 (it was called Fitness Quest: 2019 A Year in Review if you are interested), but my viewership soared. Not by a little, but by a lot. I went from 2,177 views in 2019 to 19,879 views in 2020! All without writing more than one measly post. What happened? I can tell you in one word: Google.
Google to the Rescue
After a little research I discovered that one of my post from a couple of years earlier, When is a Man’s Arm Considered Big?, made the Google front page. All of a sudden it seemed that my little blog was getting noticed and getting noticed a lot or so I thought at the time. So like any good blogger I thought – there must be a way I can capitalize on this attention. If people like that article they’ll surely like everything else I have to say.
The Best Intentions and Well Laid Plans
So I decided to dive more seriously into the blog. I rebranded what I had been calling Dave’s World into Journeys With Dave. I had the thought at the time that I would be posting more travel related content like some other bloggers who’s work I enjoyed and admired. Most notably Jon Miksis over atMy Global Viewpoint who I also wrote a travel article on little known things to do around Lake Erie for this past year. In addition to rebranding I started a Facebook page for the blog to reach a wider audience beyond my friends. I also changed my mind set. If I was going to make this work as a little “side hustle” to pay for vacations which I could then write about I needed to get serious about posting. I committed myself to posting at least one new blog a week.
Results So Far
So everything was in place and I started writing weekly. I’m pleased to say that so far I’m managing to stick to my goal of something new each week. Sometimes I’d write more than once a week, like my series on the Grumpy Old Man Tour of Walt Disney World, and once or twice I did miss my self-imposed deadline. But this year is clearly my most prolific.
So far this year I’ve posted 32 times and I’ve written 43,876 words. This is more than twice my previous best of 15,973 in 2015 with 32 posts total that year as well.
Visits are on track to beat last year’s total easily as I’m over 18,000 views as of August 21, 2021 with 4 and a half months to go. So exceeding 20,000 vies and 17,301 visitors should not be an issue. My best month for viewing was January 2021 where I reached about 3,300 views. However, this is the month that I rebranded and switched from the free WordPress.com site to a paid WordPress.com site. The main reason for this was so that I could get ad revenue. As a result I saw a big drop in views in February but my readership is climbing again and I’m over 2,200 per month currently and trending back up.
Other interesting stats (at least interesting to me):
Most popular viewership time: Tuesdays at 10:00 PM
Most viewed day: January 17, 2021 with 138 views.
Average Words Per Post: 1,371
The Plan Forward
My main issue now though is frankly one of content. That post about When is a Man’s Arm Considered Big is still far and away my most popular blog. I’m not complaining about this, but I am trying to find a topic that will also hit that front page of Google – the holy grail of blogging – and so far I’m not having a lot of luck. I am finding that similar subjects seem to have some staying power, but when I try other topics I’ll get an immediate bump in readership but that’s it. I have noticed that other bodybuilding/fitness/workout type blog entries are moving up in viewership. This may be because my primary audience, at least according to Google Analytics, are men aged 20 – 24 who are not surprisingly interested in fitness and sports. So my plan is to keep giving this audience more of what it wants, like How do Your Arms Stack up to Other Gym Bros?, and even stories of my own fitness experiences over the years. By the way, the last blog was picked up by a website that promotes scientific research articles – so that was cool.
So my plan going forward is more of the same that I’m doing now. Post on a regular basis, see if I can build a new audience to compliment the one I have, and keep having fun exploring the world of blogging. I am also slowly working into other media as well such as YouTube and Podcasting. However, there are only so many hours in a day and as fun as all the social media stuff is it doesn’t pay the bills (so far at least).
Quick Lessons Learned
Here are a few things that I think I’ve learned which I hope might help you if you decided to start at blog or are working on a blog of your own currently:
Be consistent. Writing on a regular basis keeps your followers engaged and keeps your skills fresh and sharp, too.
Don’t expect to get rich quick. Or get rich slowly for that matter. If you do great and please let me know your secret. However, the odds are against this happening. So remember you are in this for the long haul. As long as you enjoy what you are doing I think that success will come but it will likely take years not days, weeks, or even months.
Experiment. Don’t be afraid of tackling a new subject. Your audience is looking for information. If you provide what they want, they will come back.
Check your stats. I pay attention to how each post does and try to learn from that. If you look at my first post and my posts today you’ll see a fair amount of change – for the better I hope!
Don’t be afraid to self promote. I’ve gotten better about suggesting to people that they check out my blog. I don’t know how many actually do, but my viewer counts continue to climb and I’ll get the occasional “attaboy” and “great blog” from friends and acquaintances.
So that’s it. I’ll check back in on the blogging effort at the end of this year just to let you all know how things are going. Good luck with your blog in the meantime!
All photos by David P. Wahr unless otherwise noted in which case the original artist retains all rights. Otherwise photos and words @copyright by David P. Wahr
If you read my earlier post (Addams Family vs Munsters: Can’t We All Get Along?) you know that I’m a Munsters Maniac going way back. So when my friend Mark invited me to go meet Butch Patrick who played Eddie Munster in the original series I enthusiastically said yes!
Typically, I’m not one to attend “meet the star” events but I realized that this was likely my last opportunity to meet anyone from the original cast as sadly most are now gone. Other than Butch Patrick only Pat Priest, who played the second Marilyn during the original run of the series, survives. However, since she is now 84 I suspect she doesn’t tour as much as she may have before.
Trivia tidbit – technically Butch Patrick is the second person to play Eddie. The role was played by another child actor, Nate “Happy” Derman, in the unaired pilot. Likewise Yvonne DeCarlo was the second Lily as she replaced Joan Marshall before the show aired. However, unaired pilots don’t really count in terms of television.
The Munster Koach
We met each other at Freedom Comics in Toledo, OH a few minutes before 2:00 PM which is when Butch was scheduled to appear. He had already pretty much set up and was taking pictures and signing autographs when we arrived. We were pleasantly surprised to discover that Butch was traveling with a replica of the Munster’s Koach – which in my opinion is the second coolest car ever on television. The first being the original Batmobile from the Batman TV series, a show that also had a great theme song, and which, not coincidentally, was designed by the same person: George Barris. The Koach was kept in a trailer but we were allowed to go in and take pictures. The only rules were don’t touch and don’t sit!
The closest I’ve gotten to the Batmobile – my prized model. I think the highlights are red on the real thing.
Me and the very accurate replica of the Koach, and Butch Patrick’s signature on the hood.
Meeting Butch aka Eddie Munster
Me with Butch Patrick
We had beat the crowd and only had to wait a few minutes to meet Butch Patrick. Knowing that these days many (most?) of the stars from these fan favorite shows charge for autographs I had come prepared with cash. In fact, I had enough on me to purchase a copy of Butch Patrick’s Munster Memories which he did sign for me. We talked for a few minutes and remembering some advice I had gotten years ago about meeting celebrities I asked about his current projects. I was pleased to learn that he has several things in the works including a series of interviews with surviving WWII veterans, cars, and others. If you visit his Munsters Fan website, named aptly Munsters.com, you’ll find more information on what he’s been up to and working on.
Butch was pleasant to talk to and generous with his time. I’m impressed that while Mark and I browsed the comic shop and it’s wide-array of collectibles that the line to meet Butch continued to grow. Of course there were plenty of older fanboys like myself but a number of younger people, too. It was a testament to the enduring popularity of The Munsters. Possibly the popularity of Lidsville, but I don’t think so.
I got to visit with a friend who I hadn’t seen in person for over a year thanks to COVID, meet someone whose work I enjoyed as a kid (and today), and explore a comic book shop I hadn’t visited before.
All in all, a pleasant way to spend a couple hours on a holiday afternoon!
All photos by David P. Wahr unless otherwise noted in which case the original artist retains all rights. Otherwise photos and words @copyright by David P. Wahr
Anyone who has known me for a sufficient length of time – let’s say a week – knows that I have more than a passing interest in the Bigfoot phenomenon. But, do I actually believe that an eight foot tall primate stalks the deep forests and valleys of North America? Let’s explore that a bit…
My history with Bigfoot
Is there a squatch in these woods?
Or maybe in these woods?
The earliest memory I have of being introduced to the idea that we might share our planet with undiscovered primates is when I was terrified by the appearance of the Abominable Snowman, aka “Bumble,” during the annual airing of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. The build up to Bumble’s appearance was so effective and scared me so much that I think it was several years before I actually had the nerve to look at him on our giant 24″ black and white television! Which might be more understandable if I didn’t happen to be 15 years old at the time…(just kidding, I was 4 or 5 at the time).
Flash forward a couple of years to a still young me, now out of therapy and able to watch Christmas specials on television again without hiding under the couch, reading the National Wildlife Federation’s April 1968 issue. This issue happened to feature an article on the Bigfoot mystery in Northern California. I could hardly believe my eyes – could such a thing be real? Unfortunately, unlike today where there is a new book or television show produced about Bigfoot just about every week, research resources were scarce in this pre-Google age. It wasn’t until my early teens when I stumbled across John Napier’s book Bigfoot: The Yeti and Sasquatch in Myth and Reality. Napier was one of the first notable scientists to give serious attention to the Bigfoot phenomenon. His book provided some compelling evidence, but no actual conclusion that Bigfoot or the Yeti (the primate said to live in the Himalayas) actually existed.
A squatcher is born
Clearly this structure could not be made by human hands. Only one answer makes sense…Bigfoot!
Napier’s book only whetted my appetite for all things squatchy. I devoured anything that I could regarding Sasquatch or the Yeti. I studied any articles I could find, I watched movies, and I watched docudramas like The Legend of Boggy Creek. Heck, even today I’ll watch anything that has Bigfoot, Sasquatch, or Yeti in the title. No matter how good or bad they are (spoiler: most are bad). By the way, I found the 1957 film The Abominable Snowman especially frightening and fascinating when it ran on Saturday or Sunday afternoon TV. Either on Sir Graves Ghastly or Bill Kennedy at the Movies, I’m sure it’s one of those two because Rita Bell’s Prize Movie was on during the week when I was in school. Man, I miss shows like those. The closest thing today to Bill Kennedy at the Movies is TCM. I’m glad they are keeping the tradition of talking a little about the movies before and after the show alive. But, I digress…
Other interests develop
The search continues!
Along with this Bigfoot fascination I developed an interest in world geography. How could a Yeti survive in the harsh conditions of the Himalayas (spoiler – they can’t. Most sightings are actually in the valleys not the peaks of the mountains)? How vast are the forest of North America? Where else have mysterious creatures and monsters been found? I became interested in other things – Mount Everest and wilderness exploration and tales of survival for example. My own passion for the outdoors never let up either. Even today, whenever I’m hiking I try to observe everything. Not only for signs of giant primates but for signs of other things, too.
In short, my curiosity about Bigfoot led me to explore other things about the world we live in. So my seemingly irrational fascination with Bigfoot led to a very rational exploration of nature. Ranae Holland, of Finding Bigfoot fame, in her TED talk explains this type of thing better than I can. You can watch her talk What Bigfoot Can Teach Us About Curiousity on YouTube.
So, back to the question I asked at the beginning of the blog – do I actually believe in Bigfoot? Well, the rational part of me says that the chances of a giant primate roaming the forests and mountains of North America is very slim. However, that same part of me says that it is unlikely that all those foot prints are made by pranksters. More compelling to me, after watching all those movies, is that no one in Hollywood has made a costume that looks like the creature in the famous Patterson-Gimlin film. Were a couple of cowboys really that good at faking a Sasquatch’s proportions?
Do I believe?
I won’t go so far as to say that I definitely think Bigfoot is out there. I will go so far as to say that people are seeing something. Maybe grizzly bears spend more time walking upright than we think, maybe there’s a spore in trees which causes hallucinations, maybe…I don’t know.
But there is one thing I know for sure. I would rather live in a world where the possibility of something like Bigfoot exists than a world where people are so convinced of their own pre-conceived ideas of how things should be that they can’t even entertain the possibility that there are things beyond their comprehension. That the world still holds mystery and wonder. That they could possibly be wrong in their perception of how things are because they are focused on how they want things to be.
Because beyond the limits of what you “know” is where the real adventure begins.
My collection of books on Mount Everest.
All photos by David P. Wahr unless otherwise noted in which case the original artist retains all rights. Otherwise photos and words @copyright by David P. Wahr
The recent news that Rob Zombie will be directing a “reboot” of The Munsters for NBC’s Peacock streaming service and/or theatrical release (which by the way is either the best news ever or the worst – I don’t think there’s much middle ground here) is certain to revive a debate that is as old as time…or at least as old as 1964. Which show was better – The Addams Family or The Munsters?
For those who aren’t old enough to remember, it is important to know that television in the sixties was a golden time for anyone who liked variety in their life. On any given night you might be able to watch a show with an uncle who was a Martian, a suburban housewife who was a witch, an astronaut who had his own personal genie, seven stranded castaways, superheroes, voyages to the bottom of the sea, visit millionaire hillbillies, enjoy rural life, sing with partridges, leave everything to Theodore, or even take a five year mission into deep space (just don’t get lost out there).
You could even watch shows featuring typical American families. Families with a couple of children, household pets, and even an elderly relative or two living in the same house. Two of these shows in particular had an enduring impact upon popular culture. Both first aired within a week of one another and, two years later, both were canceled at the same time as well. Both have had movies, spin-offs, cartoons, and merchandise galore. These shows have always been linked in some mysterious way and have been the subject of much debate and most people fell into one of two camps: you were either an Addams Family Fan or a Munsters Maniac. Much like politics today there was no middle ground when it came to Munsters vs Addams Family. You could like one show but not the other. Long before anyone wondered who shot a Texas oil baron, this was the debate which tore playgrounds, bars, and perhaps even a few families apart.
Both of these shows have superficial similarities. They both feature families most audiences then would consider to be unusual if not downright macabre. Both families lived in spooky houses, kept odd hours, and so on. Both families had strong parental figures who were not necessarily tied to the social stereotypes of the day. Both shows left us with mysteries to ponder – did Morticia have feet? If Grampa was Lily’s father why did everyone call him Grampa Munster? Both shows even had snappy and memorable theme songs!
But underneath each show represented a different version of the American dream.
The Munsters, in case you don’t know, are a family of “monsters” who immigrated to the United States. Grampa, who by the way is a Dracula but not the Dracula, often speaks longingly of the “old country.” Herman was assembled in a lab in Germany (at the University of Heidelberg) and lived in the United Kingdom and Transylvania before immigrating with his Transylvanian wife and father-in-law to the United States. Along with their niece, Marilyn (apparently adopted), and son, Eddie, they do their best to live out the American dream. Herman is clearly a blue-collar working man, he’s a grave digger by trade, and as a group they work hard to fit into their community by participating in civic events and attempting to know their neighbors. But like immigrant groups before them they are often shunned because of their “odd” lifestyle, customs, and appearance. Even those people who don’t scream and run away at first sight of them display a certain nervousness while around any member of the family. Except for Marilyn, the “normal” one to the audience but who is considered an unfortunate freak by the rest of the family. Oddly enough, none of the rest of the family seems to notice that they are the ones who look and act differently than everyone around them. They consider slim, blonde, and presumably blue-eyed (the show was filmed in black and white) to be ugly. But she looks like the rest of the world around them.
I think a case can be made that the Munsters are not only immigrants but that they can stand in for any minority group in the United States at the time. What they experienced, though exaggerated for comic effect in some cases and sanitized for television audiences, echoed to a small degree what many Black, Asian, LatinX, and other groups who looked or acted “different” might have experienced as unwelcome newcomers to a neighborhood.
The Addams Family, by contrast, are wealthy people from a wealthy family. They even have a butler – who is either a zombie or a Frankenstein like creation, I’m not sure – and all the trappings of wealth. Their theme song describes there house a “museum” presumably because of the rare artworks and antiques inside. Patriarch Gomez appears to be Spanish American (not Latino as we define it today), but seems to be native to the USA. Matriarch Morticia can trace her family tree back to the Salem Witch Trials. Unlike the Munsters, they do not worry about fitting in. They have money and know how to use it. Though they do seem to be civic minded, they tend to stick to the comforts of their home. The world is forced to come to them. They do what they please and don’t worry what others think of them. Like the Munsters they don’t always understand the reactions of people around them but they are in a position to not really care about it. In fact, Gomez often solves problems by literally throwing money at them! Wealth has it’s privileges and Gomez at least seems to be very aware of this.
Even though I’m a dyed-in-the-wolf’s bane Munster Maniac I do have to admit that over the years since the original television shows The Addams Family has been the more financially successful franchise. With several major motion pictures having been released, one (animated) as recently as 2019, and even Broadway musical. Though, as one of my theater friends pointed out to me, the play does have a plot more suited to The Munsters than to The Addams Family.
Prior to the news of this latest reboot The Munsters have had a handful of television specials over the decades and one poorly executed syndicated show (The Munsters today) which somehow actually stayed on the air for three seasons and ended up with 3 more episodes than the original show. However, the theme song from The Munsters is still popular with just about every indie rock band out there and was even sampled by Fallout Boy in 2015 (Dance Like Uma Thurman).
But back to my original reason for this post, can’t we all just get along? I personally think that there is room for both families in everyone’s heart and minds. In fact, I am actually a little concerned that as time goes on some of the uniqueness of each franchise is becoming eroded and I hope that both can get back to basics.
For example: in addition to the above mentioned plot of the Addams Family musical being better suited to the Munsters, the most recent film has a scene were the Addams Family is chased out of their “old country” which again is more suited to the Munsters characters. Granted, since The Addams Family is actually based on a popular series of single panel comics by Charles Addams, there is no reason to think that the entire Addams Family franchise should be limited to the television show’s canon. But even in the comics there was never a suggestion, to my knowledge at least, that the Addams family were first generation immigrants.
For the Munsters, I think that the problem of the various sequels and reboot attempts is that they focused on the slapstick comedy and not on the family and community relationships. With the exception of 1313 Mockingbird Lane. A version which I think actually did a nice job of focusing on family but strayed too far from the premise that the Munsters were trying to fit in. Plus, Herman was not made by Grampa – he is very clearly a later creation of Dr. Frankenstein’s. After all, the origins of the Munsters was based on Universal Studios wanting to take advantage of the classic monster properties already in their portfolio.
So, to sum up, I think that as long as both franchises stay true to their original character and perhaps expand on what makes each one unique that there is room for both in our lives. In fact, if treated properly, I think that both of these families can even teach us all how to be a little better in our own lives as well.
What do you think? I’d love to see your thoughts and comments.
And before anyone panics, here’s the missing Uncle Fester from the header image above.
All photos by David P. Wahr unless otherwise noted in which case the original artist retains all rights. Otherwise photos and words @copyright by David P. Wahr
Those of you who follow me on other social media (yeah, both of you) may have noticed that I usually tag any remotely fitness related post first with #oldguyslifttoo. Though it clearly hasn’t caught on I’m trying to make a point with that hashtag.
Youth and Fitness
It doesn’t take much observation to realize that in our culture and society fitness and athletic activities are the province of the young. In mo and t pro sports you’re finished before 40. A quick look through Instagram and you’ll find hundreds, if not thousands, of posts, pictures, selfies, swolfies, and not so random flexing poses of young men (and a few women) in front of bathroom mirrors. Each who seems fully dedicated to their particular workout, diet and intent on spreading their knowledge and enthusiasm to the world. Or at least get a date. Maybe both, I’m not sure, and I’m not criticizing this in the least. If it motivates anyone towards physical fitness I’m for it. Heck, if I had the abs and biceps of some of these guys I’d be right there in front of my mirror with my phone snapping a picture too.
Old = Inactive?
But, you don’t see so much from older people. Go to a gym, again filled with folks under 40. Now I’m sure that there are a lot of reasons for this. The usual being other priorities. Career, family, etc. But, these reasons don’t explain all the middle-age men and women out there who have just stopped moving. The kids are out of the house, but instead of using the time gained from no longer running mom’s transit service they have doubled down on Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime and the like. Then complain that they hurt all the time or don’t have energy.
Time for a Change
It’s time to change this folks. The benefits of daily exercise are well documented. Both men and women at any age can increase strength and improve quality of life with a moderate program of walking and weightlifting. Barring an underlying medical condition (and hey, I’m pooping into a plastic bag as I type this so I know about underlying conditions) you can stall father time. You may never have 20 inch arms or buns of steel again but you can keep your bones strong and muscles firm well into old age.
Which, for all you teens out there, doesn’t start at 30.
So, I’m proud to be an old guy who lifts, too. I hope you’ll join me.
And whoknows, maybe senior citizen swolfies will catch on too!
Facebook and Twitter have taught me many useful things in life. For example:
1. President Obama was the root of all evil.
2. The best way to express my views is to blindly copy everything I see on the internet which I agree with and share with all my “friends” before fact checking.
3. All comments made on any subject supported by someone else should be negative.
4. Donald Trump is the root of all evil.
5. The only opinions which matter are mine.
6. Cats are amazingly cute and fascinating. We should bow to them as our masters.
7. Hillary Clinton is the root of all evil.
8. All problems in the world would cease if we had more guns.
9. Sasquatch is real.
10. All problems in the world would cease if we got rid of all guns.
11. Bernie Sanders is the root of all evil.
12. Socialized medicine is the root of all evil. Unless it’s medicare or medicaid, then it’s a pretty good deal and hands off!
13. Ted Cruz is the root of all evil.
14. (Insert the name of a recently deceased celebrity here) was the greatest person who ever lived.
15. Sasquatch is fake – but UFOs, those are real!
16. All movies are horrible pieces of trash and a waste of time and money.
17. Despite number 16 most movies that are “horrible pieces of trash” break box office records.
18. When in doubt about items 4, 7, 11, and 13 see item 1.
19. (Insert the name of a recently deceased celebrity here) was a fraud and should not be honored just because s/he passed away.
20. All major “mainstream” news outlets produce fake news and push a liberal, leftist agenda.
21. The exception to item 20 is Fox News. Which despite having higher ratings than most mainstream news outlets is agenda free and not part of “mainstream.”
22. The only facts which are facts are those that I say are facts – regardless of the scientific methodology used to determine other facts.
23. Lists of opinions are as good as facts.
24. Sasquatch and UFOs are fake – but roads can be fixed by cutting taxes!
25. Seriously, people really like cats.
26. No one knows whose picture is on any given piece of U.S. currency but by God don’t change it!
27. It is a confirmed fact that this list is the best list of its kind. There is no better list so you can stop looking now. Really, I mean it, this is the best list and not fake in anyway.
The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2015 annual report for this blog.
Here’s an excerpt:
A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 1,000 times in 2015. If it were a cable car, it would take about 17 trips to carry that many people.